Aaron Hurst of the Taproot Foundation is a really smart guy who has accomplished some really amazing stuff. But, In my opinion, Mr. Hurst has seriously short-changed the distinction between a nonprofit board and "for-profit" board.
First, I do agree that recruiting wider and really reaching into the community is an important step for building a strong nonprofit board. I do not agree however that one must be more selective in recruiting who should be serving on the nonprofit board versus at a business board. As the nonprofit board are the surrogate "owners" for the public, I believe it is very important that individuals be selected for very strategic reasons while recognizing that each member must also make decisions that are both fiduciary and strategic. And, let's remember that there are also a wide number of other opportunities for fully engaging the community in non-fiduciary governance matters that help inform, lead and sell the nonprofit.
I could debate other elements of Mr. Hurst's interview but I will leave well enough alone asking that we all recognize that nonprofit governance is as challenging if not more so than for-profit governance; requires equally smart and passionate people; and, in the end, both can make a significantly large impact on the way we live.
Here's the Inc.com interview with Mr. Hurst.
The Key Differences Between Running a Startup and a Nonprofit