The US corporate world and even the US government keep telling the public that the economy is rosy and all should be hopeful. Be that as it may, nonprofit boards should be ever so conscious that this rhetoric may singularly apply to corporate America (at least the owners) and not to cities and thus not to nonprofits who are likely to continue to be a target for cities that must continue to consider how to generate revenue that the corporate sector doesn't want to contribute to.
Take for instance in Philadelphia where mayoral candidates (or Maine where the Governor) have set their eyes on changing the rules for how or what cash contributions nonprofits might pay. One candidate in Philie states that he seeks to:
Redefibe nonprofit status for universities and large medical facilities in the city. (The good news) Here, too, a change in the state constitution would be required - and would surely face opposition from the "meds and eds." Diaz pegged the short- and long-term boost at $60 million.
I suggest that at least once a quarter nonprofit boards should ask their staff to report on what legislative and related political movements may be transpiring that would have board members kick-into action to start talking to those who matter to preserve what is best for the nonprofit mission. Such reports should also include what's happening in the state and local funding legislation.
Nonprofit boards need be aware and I believe, are responsible for communicating to the "powers that be" on mission-related matters. If members need training or coaching, great. This will provide one more skill to members. If members need to work in two's, this is also an opportunity for relationship development that in the end also supports good decision making (don't underestimate the role of relationship building on boards).
So, bottom line: political agendas aren't acceptable blocks to mission. Nonprofit board members have a role in ensuring this remains true.