I first introduced this subject this year back in September: should nonprofit CEO's have term limits. As we approach the end of 2013, this subject strikes me as appropriate for continued reflection given all things end-of-years often mean.
Is there a “too long” for nonprofit CEOs?
There has been no shortage of affirmation that board chairs and all board members should have term limits. Many believe and can demonstrate that term limits provide the best long-term health of a nonprofit with a variety of rewards including at the very minimum, the removal of difficult and non-productive members. But what about a nonprofit’s paid leadership, specifically, the CEO aka Executive Director? The volunteer leadership must rotate “off” but the paid leadership can stay as long as it wants.
Why do I raise this question you might ask? For me, a student of everything-nonprofit news, I am somewhat distressed by the frequency with which I am seeing the reports of CEO malfeasance and misbehavior. I’m also struck by the number of #2s who are more vocally expressing their frustration (at least to me) over the failed predictions by the many sages who promised there would be this mass retirement of nonprofit CEOs. And yes, the economy has played a huge role this change of expectations. But THE change has not occurred and now, instead of only 15 or 20 years, nonprofit CEOs are spending 25 and even 30 years in their position.
Is this really a problem you might ask? Is it not enough to postulate that nonprofit CEOs actually do have term limits. In fact, many say, CEOs are pretty much “at-will” employees who can be fired at a moment’s notice with or without cause. And in the largest nonprofit institutions, CEOs have contracts that more or less define what is expected of them and, if expectations are not met, a new CEO will be found. I would offer though that neither of these “fall back” constructs actually achieve what nonprofit board term limits achieve: a guaranteed turnover. On the contrary, in my opinion it is the rare and unusual board that takes the step to remove a CEO for anything but the most egregious act which may be quite proper given, in my experience a nonprofit board’s general lack of ability to provide oversight and even conduct performance reviews that are objective and substantive.
So, what might a term limit actually accomplish and what would be a “reasonable” limit? As you rest during this seasonal break, here's one topic you might mull.