In this story out of New York I could be crass and say something like "if you doubted priests before this story..." but of course.......
Instead I want to raise the question: what could the board of this nonprofit currently under federal and state investigation have done to possibly prevent or this situation where the hiring of a state legislator's father and former Assemblyman coincided with the receipt by the nonprofit of $1.2 million in state funding? I would offer that an alternative question is: what fiduciary duties on the part of the board are in play with this type of transaction?
Certainly the duty of care demands that policies be in place to protect the interest of the nonprofit. Might there be a pay-to-play policy in place (hm...)? And certainly the board, even in with a consent agenda would be aware of the receipt of this size grant but would there be any reason to suspect a pay-to-play intent? Finally, under the rule that a board has only one employee, the hiring of employees is solely at the discretion of the CEO.
So, was the board doing its job?
To see the article, go here.