In today's New York Times I found at least two stories about for-profit enterprises "going" nonprofit and a separate story about the next batch of nonprofits who face losing their tax-exempt status for simply failing to comply with the IRS rule about annually filing.
Regarding the conversion from for-profit to nonprofit I ask again and again and again, what about being nonprofit makes an enterprise more sustainable than a for-profit? The generally accepted paradigm is that a nonprofit fills the void left by a lack of incentives for for-profit (which must be the case) and the lack of demand by the public for government commitment.
So, the Mineolla Theatre declares it can't make it as a for-profit -- basically, it couldn't generate enough revenue to accomodate its costs. As a business, if there's simply not the demand for your goods or services, you find other goods or services to offer or consolidate with another business or go out of business. But become a nonprofit?
This just doesn't set well with me. On the other hand -- if there are donors to be found -- even among the way to many competing demands for donors -- then so be it. Either way, for-profit or nonprofit, the consumer (aka donor) still determines success.