A settlement (see a part of the story in the Chicago Tribune) has been reached to help a number of the nonprofits who were financially injured recoup some of the money lost from the Madoff scheme. This is likely news most will be aware of by the end of the weekend.
I think many recognize that schemes like Madoff's result from greed. The promised results are usually too good to be possible but early "investors" usually do realize unbelievable gains. Of course there are those who do not gain because such returns really are, for the majority, "too good to be true". These investors are perhaps just unrealistic or unwise while definitely being hopeful.
Now, what about all those nonprofits who invested with Madoff? Mostly smart people who just had really big trust in Madoff? Well, as it turns out, some nonprofits also made significant and unreasonable gains and they too are now part of the conversation of having to give some back to help offset the losses of the many. While I should have guessed otherwise, I've got to admit a bit of a surprise in thinking that nonprofit boards also played along with what, if anyone admitted aloud, could only have been an illegal venture.
I hope that future boards will add to their investment committees one more question: can the promises being made by the offerors be legal versus "too good to be true"?