The Philadelphia Inquirer tells a story about Sister Mary Scullion, her HOME Project and the many rock stars, like Bon Jovi, and dignitaries attracted to and supportive of Sister Mary's work. Sister Scullion is most impressive having made a career that appears to have had a positive impact on the homeless in Philadelphia.
Throughout the article, one element was missing for me: any reference to a Board of Directors. Now, I know this article was focused on Sister Scullion and her associate, Joan Dawson McConnon. And, these two women do appear to have played a significant role in generating HOME's accomplishments.
But, to be honest, nonprofit founder "stars" make me anxious. And yes, I know, funders and donors give to people and Mary and Joan appear to have given good reason in lots of confidence. But where is the Board? Are they just the strong silent type who do what's needed and don't themselves need credit or a visible role. And why doesn't Sister Scullion refer to them as her back-up team or some such other status? And, what happens when the day comes when Mary and Joan are moving on? Is there a plan? And what is the board's role in ensuring all is internally strong?
Many questions. The lesson: nonprofit "rock" stars can be important change agents and attract lots of money and press for a nonprofit's work. But, let's not forget: the star is not the nonprofit. All, including the star do well to remember this lesson, particularly the board. As we know, even if the board is not out front in the public's eye, it is they who must oversee as though the nonprofit was their own business as well as ensuring adherence to mission and assuring results, in the immediate and long term.