I found an interesting article in the Wall Street Journal chronicling what is essentially the demise of a nonprofit social enterprise. The enterprise, located in Toledo, Ohio and founded in the 1940's, has, to date, been a successful revenue generating enterprise that trained the disabled. The rest of the story, simply put, is the auto industry. The enterprise is now in the wrong place with the wrong product or at least non-productive contracts. In 2007, 80% of the enterprise's contracts dried up. Reserves are now serving to meet payroll.
I'm guessing that the board has had serious and deep conversations about what's next. The questions really revolve around what is "best governance". Is "best governance" to tell management to keep scratching the earth for the unlikely contracts that can bring life back to the enterprise and use up reserves until success is met? Or might best governance mean pulling the shades down now and developing a new strategy for providing services to its employees? including finding a new "partner" that can help with management and competition?
These are questions that I am sure many nonprofit boards must currently face. Obviously, getting good answers isn't easy. Nonetheless, this is a job for a nonprofit's board -- one they must not leave to managers to solve on their own. For more about this story, visit the Wall Street Journal.