A good reminder about nonprofit board accountability and responsibility is provided in the ThirdSector UK article about a private school board that chose neither to suspend (at least temporarily) its headmaster while allegations of sexual impropriety were being investigated nor limit his contact with students after his return to the school.
While the now former headmaster was cleared of charges, the final paragraph from the Charity Commission (regulatory body) provides the lesson.
The inquiry report says there was subsequently a "marked and positive change in the attitude of the trustees", who are now "fully cooperative with the commission". They prevailed on the headmaster to leave the school later in September and have accepted a commission direction to hold a comprehensive governance review within six months of the closure of the inquiry in February.
What do you suspect the typical school board here in the "states" would do with this situation, or any nonprofit for that matter? The reminder: boards are accountable for what happens next.