A North Dakota EMS Association (that represents ambulance and emergency workers) received more than $800,000 over 5 years to produce a disaster preparedness plan. The group did complete a plan but have also been audited and found to have spent more than $100,000 on unallowable expenses (including alchohol and dinners).
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/07/22/national/a135930D83.DTL#ixzz0M624UqJ5
My usual question on matters like this: how much did/does the board know? The Association President says the group will pay back the money they've spent. The group's Executive Director position is vacant according to its website. A consequence of the problem? Let's hope so.
And, if so, I am relieved to think that the board has a clear policy about how grant money should be spent (generally, according to the grant terms like any restricted money) and what happens if the staff don't comply. This would be good governing.
See the article here.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/07/22/national/a135930D83.DTL#ixzz0M638esln
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/07/22/national/a135930D83.DTL#ixzz0M62fqHLW